![]() “Just what were they planning to find? They put me under a magnifying glass, hoping to catch something… Go ahead and watch, you creeps! Feast your eyes,” she said.Įxperts have been saying it for a while, and the public is catching up: AI is going to mess with elections. In Meduza’s coverage of the revelations, Timchenko described feeling both terrified and defiant about the discovery. This is big, not only because of Timchenko’s unique position as the co-founder of the leading Russian independent media outlet Meduza, which operates out of Latvia, but because Pegasus, built by Israeli spyware firm NSO Group, has publicly stated that it won’t deploy its products in Russia or the U.S., or against people from these countries, presumably due to pressure from the Israeli government. On Wednesday, researchers at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab and Access Now released technical evidence that Timchenko’s phone was compromised in February 2022. Pegasus, one of the world’s most pernicious surveillance technologies, infected the iPhone of acclaimed Russian journalist Galina Timchenko. At least soon, if they do as they’ve promised, CBP won’t be one of them. ![]() How are third-party companies you’ve probably never heard of getting their paws on your data? Too often, when you sign up for a new digital service and “agree” to its terms and conditions, you have no choice but to authorize the service to sell your data to companies like Venntel, which will analyze and repackage it for sale to the highest bidder. Customs and Border Patrol publicly vowed to stop buying troves of people’s location information from data broker companies like Venntel by the end of this month. On a somewhat brighter note, last week, U.S. Critical details about the program surfaced last week, thanks to a series of open records requests filed and obtained by NYU’s Brennan Center for Justice. ![]() The latter strategy, by the way, has been deployed not as part of some rogue Texas border operation but under the auspices of the U.S. I’m not sure which is worse - WhatsApp infiltration or border agencies creating fake social media profiles in order to “research” people who are seeking residency in the U.S. In Texas, it came to light in late August that a group of Texas National Guard members - acting within Governor Greg Abbott’s controversial state-run border mission - had carried out an unauthorized spy operation in which they deliberately infiltrated WhatsApp groups used by migrants and smugglers to communicate about their routes. too, as we learn more about border security and management agencies’ exploitation of digital data to surveil people trying to enter the U.S. The surveillance industrial complex should be top of mind in the U.S. from across the globe in pursuit of a better life? In a world where everyone depends on internet-based tools to communicate, travel, work and earn money - tools that collect gobs of data about us along the way - the question feels pertinent. What might this mean for migrants coming to the U.K. ![]() There’s a difference between governments hoovering up data as a routine practice and immigration agencies tracking individuals after they cross a border, but the case should set some precedent concerning the data privacy rights of non-U.K. citizens, the court decided they still had some baseline rights to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights. Even though the two plaintiffs aren’t U.K. When the Tribunal refused to hear their case, they took it to Strasbourg. Guarnieri and Wieder originally brought their case to the U.K.’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal in 2016, in what amounted to a test of the system in the wake of the Edward Snowden revelations, which exposed the large-scale spy programs of not only the U.S., but also the U.K., Australia, Canada and New Zealand governments. The court found that plaintiffs Claudio Guarnieri and Joshua Wieder, both experts on data protection and surveillance, “reasonably” believed that the GCHQ, the U.K.’s main intelligence agency, had intercepted their data under its bulk data collection regime. On Tuesday, the European Court of Human Rights issued a pivotal ruling on mass surveillance that should have implications in the U.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |